As someone working within the fitness industry, I've frequently encountered the reality of cronyism and vested interests that aim to govern and monopolise the sector. Reading "Unfair Play: The Battle For Women's Sport" by Sharron Davies and Craig Lord, these recurring themes resonated profoundly, particularly regarding the context of women's sports.

The authors compellingly argue for fairness within women's sports, highlighting the negligence of organisations such as the International Olympic Committee (IOC) concerning the integrity of women's sports. This rings true with my experiences concerning regulatory bodies like Sport England, which often purport to enforce standards for "safety". However, these actions can instead inhibit genuine competition and innovation, creating an environment of gatekeeping rather than fostering equitable participation.

From my libertarian viewpoint, I staunchly uphold individual rights and equality principles. And by equality, I refer to equal rights, not biological uniformity. Recognising the physical differences between men and women doesn't insinuate a hierarchy or supremacy. Men and women are different yet equal, and this fundamental truth shouldn't disrupt the essence of fair competition.

Imposing blanket regulations by governing bodies can obstruct this nuanced understanding. The industry should be allowed to innovate and discover solutions organically, free from the stranglehold of excessive regulatory control.

The complex challenge proposed by Davies and Lord that self-identifying transgender women may hold unfair biological advantages in women's sports requires careful navigation. The libertarian philosophy of non-aggression and respect for individual rights supports the freedom of gender self-identification. Still, we must ensure that this freedom does not compromise fair competition or the rights of biological women.

A potential solution that aligns with libertarian principles is a free-market response. For instance, establishing additional competition categories or leagues could facilitate the participation of transgender athletes without undermining the integrity of women's sports. This approach respects individual liberties while maintaining fair competition without the need for overbearing regulations.

In light of these considerations, I must express my hope for one of my role models, Joe De Sena, who aspires to make Obstacle Racing an Olympic sport. I hope he doesn't capitulate to the vested interests that could compromise the integrity of the sport, as outlined in the book.

Athletes should be free to earn their living without restrictions imposed by Sports Governing Bodies. They should also be free to voice their opinions publicly on issues they feel strongly about. "Unfair Play: The Battle For Women's Sport" reveals pressing concerns in women's sports, many of which I've observed first hand in the fitness industry. From my libertarian standpoint, advocating for individual rights, and free-market solutions is essential to ensure fairness in women's sports.